n8n vs Make vs Zapier (2025 Comparison): Which Is the Best?

Choosing the right automation tool can feel overwhelming. With so many options available in 2025, n8n vs Make vs Zapier is one of the most common comparisons users face. Each promises to save time, cut down on repetitive work, and connect your favorite apps, but they do so in very different ways.

In this guide, we will walk through their strengths, pricing, and best use cases so you can quickly see which one fits your needs.

Quick Introduction to n8n vs Make vs Zapier

1. Zapier

Zapier emerged in 2011 as one of the first widely adopted automation platforms. It quickly became popular among beginners and small teams due to its simplicity and ease of use. With thousands of ready-made integrations covering almost every major app, Zapier made it easy for non-technical users to automate repetitive tasks and connect their favorite tools without coding.

2. Make

Make, formerly known as Integromat, rose to prominence as a platform for more advanced users. It offers a visual interface for designing multi-step workflows with conditions, branching, and data transformations. Its focus on flexibility and complex workflow design made it a favorite among power users, agencies, and teams that needed more than basic “if this then that” automations.

3. n8n

n8n started as an open-source alternative designed for developers and technically skilled teams. Its self-hosting capability, support for custom nodes, and API flexibility allow teams to have full control over their workflows. While it requires more technical expertise, n8n’s approach appeals to those who want ultimate customization and ownership of their automation processes.

Key Features Compared: n8n vs Zapier vs Make

All three tools can automate tasks, but their real differences show in the details. Let’s see how n8n, Zapier, and Make compare across key features.

Integrations

A key factor in choosing an automation tool is how many apps it can connect to and how easily it handles them.

Zapier leads the pack with over 7,000 integrations covering almost every mainstream SaaS product. From project management tools like Trello and Asana to marketing platforms like Mailchimp and HubSpot, it’s hard to find an app that Zapier doesn’t support.

Make has fewer integrations but covers most major business apps, including Google Workspace, Slack, Notion, Airtable, and specialized tools like ClickUp or Monday.com. Its strength lies in handling data between apps flexibly—transforming and structuring information before sending it to another service.

n8n’s library is smaller out of the box, but it shines in openness. Being open source, developers can create custom nodes for almost any API, and the community constantly adds new integrations. This makes it possible to connect niche or in-house tools that Zapier or Make might not support.

Quick Summary

• Zapier: Largest app library, easiest for quick setup
• Make: Strong app coverage with flexible data handling
• n8n: Highly flexible, supports custom and niche integrations

Customization and Workflow Logic

When it comes to building workflows, each platform takes a different approach.

Zapier focuses on simplicity. Most automations follow a straightforward trigger → action sequence, like “When a new form is submitted, send a Slack notification.” It works well for basic tasks, but handling multiple conditions, loops, or complex data transformations is limited.

Make offers more customization through its visual editor. Users can drag and drop modules, create branches, set conditional logic, and iterate over data. For example, you can pull spreadsheet entries, filter them, and perform different actions for each group. This makes complex workflows possible without writing code.

n8n is the most flexible, allowing custom code and nodes. Developers can write JavaScript, connect to unsupported APIs, and self-host to control workflow execution. This enables almost limitless possibilities, but requires technical skills.

Quick Summary

• Zapier: Simple, linear workflows; limited for complex automation
• Make: Visual editor with branching and conditions; code-free flexibility
• n8n: Full customization, API and code support; requires technical knowledge

Automation and Artificial Intelligence

As automation tools evolve, the ability to leverage artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important.

Zapier offers some AI-powered features mainly through integrations with AI apps like OpenAI or AI-based email and text tools. These capabilities are limited and generally rely on external services rather than being native to the platform.

Make supports AI similarly by letting users integrate external AI services into workflows for tasks like text analysis, sentiment detection, or image processing. Its visual editor helps structure these workflows, but the platform itself doesn’t provide built-in AI models.

n8n gives developers maximum flexibility to integrate AI anywhere in their workflows. You can connect custom AI models, APIs, or host your own AI services. This approach is powerful but requires technical expertise to implement effectively.

Quick Summary

• Zapier: AI via integrations; easy but limited
• Make: Flexible AI workflows through external services; visual editor helps
• n8n: Full AI integration freedom; requires technical skills

Security and Enterprise Readiness

When it comes to automation, security and governance are often overlooked until teams start scaling. Here’s how Zapier, Make, and n8n compare in this area:

• Zapier has basic security measures like data encryption and SSO for higher-tier plans, but it mainly caters to small and medium businesses. You won’t find advanced governance features such as granular role-based access, detailed audit logs, or enterprise compliance certifications.
• Make offers better collaboration controls than Zapier, including team workspaces and permissions. However, its enterprise readiness is still limited. Compliance frameworks and advanced governance options are not its strongest point, so larger organizations may find gaps if they need strict control and oversight.
• As an open-source platform, n8n gives you full control over where and how you host it. That flexibility is powerful, but it also shifts responsibility to you. Security, compliance, and governance depend on your team’s setup and expertise, which can be a heavy lift for enterprises without strong IT resources.

In short, all three tools fall short when it comes to true enterprise-grade readiness. This leaves a gap for organizations that need advanced security, compliance, and governance built into their automation platform.

Pricing Comparison for Make, Zapier, and n8n

Pricing is often one of the first things users check before committing to an automation platform. While all three tools—Zapier, Make, and n8n—offer ways to get started for free, their long-term costs can vary a lot depending on how much you automate.

Zapier uses a subscription model based mainly on the number of “tasks” you run each month. The free plan is very limited, and once you start building serious workflows, you’ll quickly need to move to a paid plan. Pricing scales up fast, which makes Zapier convenient but relatively expensive, especially for teams that process thousands of tasks.

Make also uses a subscription model, but instead of tasks, it charges based on the number of “operations.” This gives users more flexibility, and in most cases, Make’s paid plans are more affordable than Zapier’s. Advanced users also appreciate that even lower-tier plans include features like scheduling and error handling, which are usually locked behind higher-tier Zapier plans.

n8n is different. If you self-host it, the platform is free to use, which can be very attractive for developers and teams with the technical know-how. However, “free” doesn’t mean zero cost—you’ll need to handle server hosting, updates, and maintenance. n8n also offers a managed cloud version with subscription pricing, which is closer to Zapier and Make but still more developer-friendly.

Pricing is just the starting point. You should also take into account the ease of use of functions and team resources. More importantly, with the rise of AI automation, simply comparing prices is no longer sufficient to make a decision. You need to consider the differences in intelligence and enterprise-level capabilities among these platforms.

Final Verdict: Which One Should You Pick?

Before making your final choice, it often helps to see everything side by side. The decision matrix table below brings together all the key factors we’ve discussed. This way, you can quickly spot which platform matches your priorities without getting lost in the details.

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer here. Zapier shines for beginners and teams that value simplicity. Make offers more flexibility and control for those who want to design complex workflows visually. Meanwhile, n8n gives developers and advanced users unmatched freedom with its open-source model and cost efficiency.

Enterprise-Ready Alternative to Zapier, Make, and n8n

While Zapier, Make, and n8n are powerful automation tools, they often fall short when enterprises demand strict security, governance, and AI capabilities. Zapier is user-friendly but limited in enterprise-grade compliance. Make offers flexibility but can be difficult to manage at scale. n8n provides control through self-hosting, yet the burden of maintenance and security rests entirely on the team.

GoInsight.AI bridges this gap with an enterprise-ready automation platform designed for modern organizations. Built with both technical and non-technical users in mind, it combines the ease of a visual workflow engine with the robustness of advanced AI integration, strong governance, and compliance frameworks.

GoInsight.AI doesn’t just automate tasks, it empowers organizations to build agentic workflows that think, adapt, and comply with enterprise standards. If you’re looking for more than just integrations, it’s time to experience automation at the next level with GoInsight.AI.

Wrapping Up

In the comparison of n8n vs Make vs Zapier, it’s clear each platform brings unique strengths but also limitations for enterprise use. Traditional automation tools focus on integrations, while modern businesses increasingly need AI-powered, secure, and scalable workflows. That’s why exploring enterprise-ready solutions like GoInsight.AI can open the door to a new way of working—where automation is not just about connecting apps, but about building intelligent, adaptive workflows that truly transform business operations.

FAQs

Which is better, Zapier, Make, or n8n?

Alex Rivera

It depends on your needs. Zapier is best for simplicity and quick setups, Make excels at visual, flexible workflows, and n8n offers maximum control for developers who need custom automation. Each has strengths for different use cases.

Can these platforms handle complex workflows with multiple conditions or loops?

Alex Rivera

Zapier is great for simple automations but struggles with complex branching and loops. Make handles multi-step workflows well with visual logic, while n8n offers full flexibility, allowing custom code and nodes for advanced workflow scenarios.

How secure are n8n, Make, and Zapier for enterprise use?

Alex Rivera

Zapier offers basic security and SSO for higher-tier plans, Make provides team permissions and workspaces, and n8n’s security depends on your self-host setup. All three lack built-in enterprise-grade governance and compliance out of the box.

Share: